11SIX24 Jelly Bean 2: Specs, Release Date and All Four Shapes Compared
The 11SIX24 Jelly Bean 2 launches August 21, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern as a four-shape, 16 mm foam paddle family featuring HexGrit and a $169.99 MSRP. The Jelly Bean name may be the most misleading thing about it. The original was a value-focused control paddle. Jelly Bean 2 is a separate foam performance line built to make power easier to live with.
It will be available in Huarache-X, Vapor, Ultré and Pegasus shapes. The construction is shared, but the measurements are not. Current blended swing-weight data stretches from about 111 for Pegasus to above 121 for Ultré. That is enough separation that choosing the right shape may matter as much as choosing Jelly Bean 2 over Power 2.
Coach Sid’s pre-launch read: David Groechel first shared the Jelly Bean 2 concept with me roughly nine months ago, and I have followed its development from core discussions through prototype revisions and the expansion into four shapes. My current read is that Jelly Bean 2 is the softer Power 2 alternative, with early testers also reporting more dwell, pocketing and forgiveness. David has said the original Jelly Bean will remain a separate value option, so JB2 should not be treated as its direct replacement. I have not completed final production testing. Throughout this guide, I separate 11SIX24’s confirmed product information, third-party instrumented measurements, early tester feedback and conclusions I have personally verified.
11SIX24 Jelly Bean 2 at a glance
| Detail | Current information |
|---|---|
| Release date | August 21, 2026 |
| Release time | 3:00 p.m. Eastern |
| MSRP | $169.99 |
| Shapes | Huarache-X, Vapor, Ultré, Pegasus |
| Core thickness | 16 mm |
| Construction | New all-foam formulation |
| Surface | HexGrit |
| Classification | Low-end power / aggressive all-court |
| Early feel description | Soft, dense, plush and high-dwell |
| Approval | UPA-A approved |
| USA Pickleball approval | Not approved; no approval planned as of July 31, 2026 |
| Main difference from Power 2 | Softer response, with early reports of more dwell and pocketing |
The Jelly Bean name is a little misleading
The name connects Jelly Bean 2 to the original. The construction, price and intended player do not. David has said the original 11SIX24 Jelly Bean will remain the entry-level value option. Jelly Bean 2 moves into a higher-performance foam category with HexGrit, more power by design and four shape choices.
Here is the cleanest way I can describe it before final testing: Jelly Bean 2 is a plush, high-dwell, low-end power paddle for players who want modern offense without the stiff, immediate response of a true power paddle.
Is Jelly Bean 2 a control, all-court or power paddle?
The labels are messy because this paddle sits between categories. 11SIX24 places Jelly Bean 2 at the low end of the power category. I would describe it as an aggressive all-court paddle: livelier than a traditional control paddle, softer than most true power paddles and much more performance-oriented than the original Jelly Bean.
- Control describes the soft response, dwell and pocketing reported in early testing.
- All-court describes the intended balance between offense and touch.
- Low-end power describes where 11SIX24 places its overall output.
- Sneaky power is tester language for pace that exceeds the soft, muted impact feedback.
Jelly Bean 2 vs. Power 2: this is more than a power difference
Jelly Bean 2 is not Power 2 with five percent less power. The ball is expected to stay on the face longer, the impact feels substantially softer in early testing and the extra pocketing may require different stroke timing. Players who find Power 2 too stiff or immediate may strongly prefer Jelly Bean 2. Players who bought Power 2 because they love explosive pop may still prefer it.
The buying decision: Choose Jelly Bean 2 because you want a softer response and are drawn to the early reports of more dwell, pocketing and forgiveness. Choose Power 2 because you want the ball gone now. The lower price should not be the first reason you choose between them.
| Feature | Jelly Bean 2 | Power 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power level | Low-end power | Higher power |
| Pop | More controlled | Faster and more immediate |
| Feel | Soft, plush and muted in early feedback | Stiffer and crisper |
| Dwell | Reportedly higher | Lower by comparison |
| Pocketing | Reportedly more pronounced | Less pronounced by comparison |
| Forgiveness | Tester-described as higher | More demanding by comparison |
| Sweet spot | Reportedly larger-feeling | Smaller-feeling by comparison |
| Best for | Softness and control without giving up offense | Maximum speed and explosive response |
| MSRP | $169.99 | Higher-priced flagship tier |
For more detail on how shape changes the Power 2 family, see my 11SIX24 Power 2 comparison. I have also tested the Vapor Power 2, Ultré Power 2, Huarache-X Power 2 and Pegasus Power 2.
Jelly Bean 2 is not the new budget Jelly Bean
The original Jelly Bean still owns the entry-level role. Jelly Bean 2 uses the name, but its $169.99 price, foam construction and performance target put it in a different category.
| Feature | Original Jelly Bean | Jelly Bean 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position | Entry-level/value | Modern foam performance |
| Price | Under $100 | $169.99 |
| Power target | Lower | Higher by design |
| Surface | Previous-generation surface | HexGrit |
| Intended player | Beginners and budget buyers | Improving through advanced players |
| Product role | Will remain available as the value option | Separate foam performance family |
Jelly Bean 2 specifications: all four shapes compared
The measurements below are blended averages from two independently tested samples. Individual production paddles may vary, so blended results are more useful than presenting one sample as universal.
| Shape | Type | Length | Width | Handle | Weight | Swing weight | Twist weight | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pegasus | Widebody | 15.83″ | 8.09″ | 5.61″ | 8.11 oz | 111.38 | 7.16 | 23.95 cm |
| Huarache-X | Elongated | 16.41″ | 7.49″ | 5.96″ | 7.96 oz | 116.60 | 6.05 | 24.50 cm |
| Vapor | Hybrid | 16.18″ | 7.78″ | 5.59″ | 8.22 oz | 119.23 | 6.71 | 24.15 cm |
| Ultré | Hybrid | 16.28″ | 7.63″ | 5.61″ | 8.20 oz | 121.08 | 6.78 | 24.40 cm |
The shape may matter more than the name on the paddle. Pegasus and Ultré share the same JB2 construction, but a swing-weight gap of nearly ten points means they should not feel remotely identical in the hands.
Pegasus wins the spreadsheet for quickness and measured stability. Ultré carries the highest measured swing weight and the most substantial swing profile on paper. Huarache-X gives elongated players the longest handle and the most reach in the JB2 family without the highest swing weight. Vapor is the familiar hybrid choice, but its current measurements are heavier than “middle ground” may sound.
What the numbers do not tell you
Swing weight can warn you about hand speed, and twist weight can suggest resistance to twisting on off-center contact. Neither number tells you exactly how the foam, face response, balance point and sweet-spot shape will behave when a speed-up reaches your hip or you are resetting from your shoelaces. The measurements narrow the decision. Final court testing still has to finish it.
Players planning to customize a paddle should also pay attention to starting swing weight. Adding weight can improve stability and plow-through, but Vapor and Ultré may have less room before they become cumbersome. My guide to adding weight to a pickleball paddle explains how placement changes the result.
Pegasus: quickest on paper with the strongest measured stability
Pegasus has the strongest measured quickness-and-stability profile in the family. Its 111.38 blended swing weight is the lowest, while its 7.16 twist weight is the highest. That combination points toward quick reloads and better resistance to twisting on imperfect contact.
Best fit: Doubles players who prioritize fast hands, a large face and strong measured resistance to twisting.
Main concern: Detailed firsthand Pegasus JB2 testing remains limited. The current recommendation is based on measurements, established Pegasus geometry and the expected behavior of the shared construction.
Confidence level: Strong measured case; final court verification pending.
Huarache-X: longest handle without the heaviest swing
Huarache-X has the longest handle and the most reach in the JB2 family, making it the clearest starting point for players who prioritize elongated reach and two-handed backhand room. Its 116.60 blended swing weight is lower than both hybrid shapes.
Here is the odd part: Huarache-X has the lowest measured twist weight in the family, yet prototype testers repeatedly described a large, responsive sweet spot with few severe dead areas. The number and the tester reports are arguing with each other. Final testing needs to settle it.
Best fit: Players who want reach, the most handle room and an elongated shape without taking on the heaviest swing profile.
Main concern: Its measured twist weight suggests less off-center stability than the other shapes.
Confidence level: Strong geometry case; forgiveness remains an important open question.
Vapor: the most familiar shape, with one catch
Vapor offers the most familiar all-court geometry in the lineup. It gives you more width than Ultré without moving all the way to the Pegasus widebody, so it is the most familiar starting point for players who already know they like a conventional hybrid.
Early testers described the Vapor JB2 as buttery, forgiving and easy to control, with manageable pop and more power than the former All Court line. The catch is hand speed. Its current blended swing weight is 119.23, so this is not an especially light hybrid through the air.
Best fit: Players who want a familiar hybrid silhouette and do not want to commit to either widebody or elongated extremes.
Main concern: The current swing weight may feel slower than buyers expect from a balanced hybrid.
Confidence level: Familiar shape and useful early feedback; final hand-speed and reset testing pending.
Ultré: most substantial swing, biggest hand-speed concern
Ultré may be the most intriguing shape in the release, but its swing weight is also the clearest buying caution. Its current blended swing weight of 121.08 is the highest in the family, pointing toward the most substantial swing profile and the slowest reloads.
A 121 swing weight is not automatically bad. Players who like a substantial paddle may appreciate the extra mass, plow-through and planted feel. Quick-hands players should approach it more carefully. Early hands-on feedback described the Ultré JB2 as soft with “sneaky power,” but that phrase needs final court context before it becomes a PickleTip conclusion.
Best fit: Players who value plow-through, reach and a planted swing more than maximum hand speed.
Main concern: It may become cumbersome for players who already struggle to reload in fast exchanges or plan to add perimeter weight.
Confidence level: Strong measurement-based warning; final live-play verdict pending.
Which Jelly Bean 2 shape should you buy?
This table gets you into the right neighborhood. Your preferred shape, stroke mechanics and tolerance for swing weight still get the final vote.
| Your priority | Start with | Why | Main caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast hands and measured stability | Pegasus | Lowest swing weight and highest twist weight | Final firsthand testing remains limited |
| Most reach in the JB2 family and longest handle | Huarache-X | Elongated shape with approximately 5.96 inches of handle length | Lowest measured twist weight |
| Familiar hybrid balance | Vapor | Conventional middle-ground geometry | Higher-than-expected swing weight |
| Plow-through and substantial feel | Ultré | Highest swing weight and the most substantial swing profile | Biggest hand-speed concern |
| Two-handed backhand room | Huarache-X | Longest measured handle in the family | Low twist weight; positive prototype reports |
| Largest face and strongest measured resistance to twisting | Pegasus | Widebody dimensions and highest twist weight | Less reach than elongated options |
| Soft hybrid with maximum swing mass | Ultré | Early soft-feel reports paired with the heaviest swing profile | Less room for added weight |
| Unsure and want a familiar silhouette | Vapor | Balanced width and reach | Do not assume “hybrid” means light in the hands |
Pegasus vs. Vapor
Start with Pegasus when fast hands, a wider contact window and measured stability matter most. Start with Vapor when you prefer a familiar hybrid shape and want more reach than a widebody. The tradeoff is that Vapor currently carries almost eight more swing-weight points.
Huarache-X vs. Ultré
Both shapes favor reach, but they get there differently. Huarache-X gives you the longest handle and a lower swing weight. Ultré gives you the higher swing weight and the more substantial swing. Two-handed backhand players should start with Huarache-X; players who actively want plow-through may prefer Ultré.
What the high Vapor and Ultré swing weights mean
This is already one of the biggest buyer concerns surrounding the release. Current independent samples place Vapor near 119 and Ultré above 121. Those numbers point toward slower hand speed than many players expect from modern foam paddles, especially compared with the lighter Power 2 shapes.
Higher swing weight generally means more rotational mass moving through contact. The question is whether you still want that mass when somebody speeds the ball up at your right hip. Whether Vapor and Ultré play as heavy as the numbers suggest remains one of the most important questions for final testing. Players who routinely add perimeter weight should be especially cautious because both shapes may offer less customization room before the paddle becomes cumbersome.
How early testers describe the new foam
David Groechel described the core as a new all-foam formulation. Published third-party testing identifies the foam as EMA-based, but 11SIX24 has not fully disclosed the exact chemistry.
Early testers keep using the same words: soft, dense, plush, muted and high-dwell. The ball appears to sit on the face longer than it does on Power 2. That may help drops, resets, roll volleys and controlled counters, but players coming from crisp, immediate paddles may need a timing adjustment.
I am deliberately stopping short of turning those early descriptions into my own review. Final testing needs to answer whether the extra dwell actually improves panic resets and controlled counters, whether the muted feedback hides more pace than expected and how quickly each shape settles after break-in.
How powerful is Jelly Bean 2?
Jelly Bean 2 appears considerably stronger than the original Jelly Bean and traditional control paddles, but below Power 2 in immediate pop. Many early testers have sgreed that JB2 sits above Coral Pro for power while feeling softer and more muted.
Think usable power, not sledgehammer power. Early testers report that the paddle does not feel explosive at impact, yet the ball leaves with more pace than the plush feedback suggests. That is what “sneaky power” means here. I still want to see which shots produce it and whether that pace remains predictable when the point speeds up.
For a tested reference point, see my Six Zero Coral Pro review.
HexGrit, spin and surface durability
All four Jelly Bean 2 shapes use HexGrit. In third-party instrumented testing, all four received a Tier 1 spin-durability classification and measured between approximately 2,341 and 2,418 RPM. Separate surface testing also reported unusually high roughness measurements across the line.
| Shape | Third-party spin RPM | Spin-durability classification |
|---|---|---|
| Huarache-X | 2,418 | Tier 1 |
| Vapor | 2,389 | Tier 1 |
| Ultré | 2,354 | Tier 1 |
| Pegasus | 2,341 | Tier 1 |
I would not choose among the four shapes because one produced 40 or 70 more RPM in this sample set. Those small gaps are likely within normal testing variation. The useful conclusion is that all four landed in the same elite-spin neighborhood. Initial roughness, measured RPM and long-term spin durability are related, but they are not the same thing.
Is Jelly Bean 2 tournament legal?
Jelly Bean 2 is UPA-A approved. It is not USA Pickleball approved, and as of July 31, 2026, 11SIX24 had no plan to pursue USA Pickleball approval. Tournament players can verify current status through the official UPA-A approved paddle list and USA Pickleball approved paddle database.
Approval requirements vary by event, league and governing body. PickleTip explains the distinction in its guides to UPA-A-approved paddles, USA Pickleball-approved paddles and the broader USAP vs. UPA-A approval difference.
Tournament warning: UPA-A approved and USA Pickleball approved are not interchangeable labels. Verify the rules for the events you actually play.
Is Jelly Bean 2 worth $169.99?
You are not paying $169.99 because this is a cheap Jelly Bean. You are paying for full-foam construction, HexGrit, elite measured spin and four legitimate shape choices at a lower price than Power 2.
It costs about $70 more than the original Jelly Bean and approximately $40 less than the Power 2 flagship tier. Power 2 may still justify the extra money for players chasing maximum raw power. Jelly Bean 2 may be the better value for players who find Power 2 too stiff or poppy, even before the savings enter the conversation.
At $169.99, each JB2 shape has to make its value case differently. Pegasus offers the strongest quickness-and-stability case on paper. Huarache-X gives elongated players the longest handle without the family’s highest swing weight. Vapor and Ultré need to prove that their extra swing mass pays players back during live play.
Who should buy Jelly Bean 2?
- Players who want foam softness without giving up offensive capability
- Players who prefer dwell, pocketing and muted impact feedback
- Players who find Power 2 too stiff or too poppy
- Players willing to trade some crispness for a softer response around the kitchen and through the transition zone
- Players who still want enough pace to finish points
- Improving players who want more performance headroom than a basic first paddle
An improving beginner could grow into Jelly Bean 2, with Pegasus presenting the easiest measured starting point for many newer players because it combines the lowest swing weight with the highest twist weight. Huarache-X may suit a newer player who already prefers an elongated paddle and longer handle. But $169.99 is a serious first-paddle purchase, and the higher swing weights of Vapor and Ultré may make simpler, lower-priced options more practical for many new players. My pickleball paddle buyer’s guide explains the broader decision.
Who may prefer something else?
- Players who want the stiffest and most explosive response available
- Players whose events require USA Pickleball approval
- Players who prioritize maximum hand speed and are considering Vapor or Ultré
- Traditionalists who prefer a crisp polypropylene-honeycomb feel
- Budget shoppers expecting the original Jelly Bean’s approximate $100 price
How I built this pre-launch read
I have had a front-row seat to Jelly Bean 2 from the early idea stage through core discussions, prototype revisions and pre-launch testing. Over roughly nine months, it developed from a concept David shared privately into a four-shape release.
For the specification table, I averaged two independently measured samples rather than treating one paddle as universal. Static weight, swing weight, twist weight and balance point can vary from unit to unit, so one clean-looking number can create false confidence.
For feel, sweet spot and playability, I kept tester observations separate from instrumented data. Words such as “massive sweet spot,” “buttery,” “sneaky power” and “soft around the net” are useful early evidence. They are not yet Coach Sid conclusions about all four final production paddles.
When final paddles arrive, I will test the questions that measurements cannot finish: rushed blocks, fast hands exchanges, transition resets, roll volleys, off-center contact, break-in changes and how each shape behaves when timing gets ugly. That is where paddles usually tell the truth, when the contact is rushed, the feet are late and the shot is not perfectly centered.
What we still do not know
| Open question | Pre-launch read | Final test status |
|---|---|---|
| Will retail production units match the current measured samples? | Individual variance is expected | Pending |
| Do Vapor and Ultré feel as slow as their swing weights suggest? | Measurements say this is a real concern | Pending |
| Which shape has the most usable sweet spot? | Pegasus leads by measured stability; Huarache-X has strong tester reports | Pending |
| Is Huarache-X more forgiving than its twist weight predicts? | Prototype feedback says yes | Pending |
| How much does break-in change pop, softness and control? | Unknown | Pending |
| Which shape is best for resets and controlled counters? | Early feedback suggests the foam may help, but shape could change the result | Pending |
| Which shape has the best real-world balance of power, control and maneuverability? | No responsible winner yet | Pending |
| What is the complete face layup and exact publicly disclosed foam chemistry? | Not fully disclosed | Open |
11SIX24 Jelly Bean 2 FAQ
11SIX24 positions Jelly Bean 2 below Power 2 in power, with a softer response and early reports of more dwell, pocketing and forgiveness. Power 2 is stiffer, poppier and more immediate.
Start with Pegasus for fast hands and measured stability, Huarache-X for the most reach in the JB2 family and the longest handle, Vapor for familiar hybrid geometry, and Ultré for the most substantial swing. These are pre-launch recommendations, not final on-court rankings.
Jelly Bean 2 is UPA-A approved. It is not USA Pickleball approved, and as of July 31, 2026, 11SIX24 had no plan to pursue USA Pickleball approval. Check the requirements for the events you play.
Their current independent samples carry more rotational mass through the swing than Pegasus and Huarache-X. That may create a more planted feel, but it can reduce hand speed and leave less room for added perimeter weight.
Its measured twist weight is the lowest in the lineup, but prototype testers repeatedly described a large, responsive sweet spot. Final production testing is still needed to determine how well that forgiveness carries over.
It could suit an improving beginner who wants room to grow. Pegasus presents the easiest measured starting point for many newer players because it combines the lowest swing weight with the highest twist weight. Huarache-X may suit a newer player who already prefers an elongated paddle and longer handle.
Switch only if you want a softer response and early reports of more dwell, pocketing and forgiveness. Players who love Power 2 for its stiff, immediate pop and explosive output may prefer to stay with it.
My pre-launch verdict on Jelly Bean 2
The name says sequel. The product looks more like 11SIX24 created a new middle tier. Jelly Bean 2 brings HexGrit and full-foam construction below Power 2 pricing, but the softer response and shape-dependent swing weights make it a fundamentally different choice, not simply the cheaper one.
The measurements already show that these four shapes should not be treated as interchangeable. Pegasus leads the pre-launch quickness-and-stability case, while Ultré carries the clearest hand-speed caution. Huarache-X and Vapor sit between those extremes for players choosing by reach, handle room and familiar geometry.
I am not ready to crown a best shape. Final testing will decide whether Pegasus’s measured advantage holds up, whether Huarache-X plays more forgiving than its twist weight suggests and whether Vapor and Ultré repay their extra swing mass. I will update this guide as those answers come in.
Update log
- August 1, 2026: Published the pre-launch guide with blended measurements, shape recommendations, official approval resources, direct Power 2 comparisons and a final-testing checklist.







